Tuesday (Epiphany Week Year 2)
Commemoration of Harriet Bedell
Today’s assigned readings:
Exodus 17:1-7, Colossians 1:15-23, John 7:37-52
Dear Friends,
He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation
Colossians 1:15
As noted in an earlier post, there are some doubts about who wrote this Epistle. It could have been Paul, or - in order to explain language and style differences between Colossians and other epistles - it could have been Paul dictating through someone (possibly Timothy); or it could have been written without Paul at all, but in the name of Paul by any one (or more) of his disciples.
What is certain, its theology is expanded, more fully developed than other Epistles. And it quotes hymnody - which means the Christian community would have needed time to develop such.
The passage assigned today is “‘The Christ Hymn’ Of Colossians”. Depending on who you ask the hymn is verses 11-20, or maybe 15-20, or possibly some other combo of the verses between 11 and 28.
What you can see, if you look at the opening passages of this epistle, is the number of times Paul says “All”. I think this hymn is better called the “All” hymn. “All” sorts of blessings are offered to the Colossians, then “All” kinds of things are claimed for Jesus.
“All” is a translation of the Greek word πας pas. It is used 1075 times in the New Testament. It’s used eight times in verses 15-20. Paul is making some important claims about Jesus and how God works through Jesus effecting salvation for us.
Here are all the “all” claims in verses 15 - 19
15: Jesus is “firstborn of all creation”
16: Through Jesus “all things in heaven and on earth were created” and “all things have been created”.
17: Jesus is “before all things” and in Jesus “all things hold together”.
18: Jesus has “first place in all things”.
19: In Jesus is “all the fullness of God”.
The word all in the Bible Dictionary I use links to this curious disclaimer:
“the whole world has gone after him” Did all the world go after Christ? “then went all Judea, and were baptized of him in Jordan. “Was all Judea, or all Jerusalem, baptized in Jordan? “Ye are of God, little children”, and the whole world lieth in the wicked one”. Does the whole world there mean everybody? The words “world” and “all” are used in some seven or eight senses in Scripture, and it is very rarely the “all” means all persons, taken individually. The words are generally used to signify that Christ has redeemed some of all sorts — some Jews, some Gentiles, some rich, some poor, and has not restricted His redemption to either Jew or Gentile.
The thing is how it builds up from a simple use of literary hyperbole to that final theological claim that “Christ has redeemed some of all sorts”. “All Jerusalem” is clearly hyperbole.
What about “All the fullness of God”? Is that Hyperbole?
What about the claim that “All things” are made through Jesus?
Do we need to read this disclaimer into these early verses of the hymn? Only some-but-not-all things come before Jesus? There are some other things that are before him. Only some but not all of the fullness of God dwells in Jesus, there are some things that are not Jesus at all. There are some things, in fact, that are more important than Jesus.
That would explain, of course, the final “all” in the hymn, in verse 20, that in Jesus’ actions…
All things. Oh My God, is Paul (or at least this hymn being quoted) making a claim for Universalism, again?
Well…
Does “all” mean “all”?
Yes, it is quite possible to proof-text particular salvation out of the Bible. Some people are going to be-not-saved. Some will be saved. But we normally use that proof-texting as a way to condemn some (usually those with whom we politically or theologically disagree). It is also possible to proof-text the claims of universal salvation in such a way as to override all conception of free will.
It is neither possible nor desirable for God to coerce from the hearts of his creations affection for himself.
How do we reconcile the clear Biblical and patristic claim of universal God-ward reconciliation with the clear Biblical and patristic claim that some people won’t want to be involved?
We’re so very used to the idea of “two places” for people: a good place, heaven with God. And a bad place - hell - with lots of fire. What if they are both the same place? Look to the patristic claim that “the afterlife” will mean full participation in the presence of God, full communion - to know and be known - in God and the fullness of all creation. But to some people, that will be hell for they won’t desire this at all. All things - all meaning all - are reconciled to God. But some people don’t like that idea at all.
Imagine being subject to a political leader for whom you did not vote. Imagine being subject to a political leader whom you imagine to be opposed to your freedoms. Imagine being subject to a political leader whom you imagine somehow engineered a peaceful coup, and so, for a period of time (until the next election) you’re stuck with this man in office that you did not vote for and whom you think stole the election. And here you are, stuck in the country he leads, and he is - really - your leader for some period of time or, God forbid, maybe he wins a second election and you have to suffer through yet another period of time with this leader.
Just try to imagine that happened.
Of your own free will, that man would not be leader, but, yet - either through might, or coercion, graft, skill, or just dumb luck - that man is your leader. Do you stay or do you go?
Can you walk away while keeping your home, your job, your family and friends, etc?
Or would you spend the entire time insisting that, in fact, that man wasn’t your leader? Would you spend the entire period trying to discover the assumed graft that placed that man in power? Would you wear t-shirts and bumper stickers that insisted your leader was someone else; make videos exposing the fraud, protest in the streets every chance you got, and have people snicker at you behind your back because, well, how can anyone be so dense?
If so, perhaps you might spend a period of time in my idea of “hell” in a universalist sense - full participation available but rejected.
So when this hymn says “all” does it mean “all”?
Yes, I think so - and I take comfort in that belief.
Much love,
Huw